Monthly Archives: October 2011

An Attorney Is Not A Subdivision And Relief Must Be Reasonable

In Veneri v. Pappano, there were two take away points, one for attorneys who work for the government and the other for clients who feel they have been wronged by their attorneys. 622 A. 2d 977 (Pa. Superior 1993). The … Continue reading

Posted in Legal Malpractice, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Monthly Column – Does Settlement Preclude Legal Malpractice?

Instinctively, it has generally been wide-felt that settlement of an action cures all.  Certainly, courts promote settlement (especially nowadays, towards the ever-declining percentage of cases tried).  Likewise, case law generally renders settlements – even verbally agreed – as difficult to … Continue reading

Posted in Legal Malpractice, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Actual Damages Must Actually Be Alleged

In Pashak v. Barish, the husbad of the appellant, William Pashak, agreed to settle a negligence case for $100,000 in accordance with advice from his attorney, Marvin Barish, Esq. 450 a2d 67 (1982). The settlement stemmed from an employment action where Mr. … Continue reading

Posted in Legal Malpractice, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

With Divorce, There Are Still Some Damages That Must Be Defined

In Mariscotti v. Tinari, the court found that a finding of Summary judgment was appropriate when Joan K. Mariscotti, the wife in a divorce settlement, made a complaint of loss that was too speculative. 335 Pa. Super. 599, 485 A.2d … Continue reading

Posted in Legal Malpractice, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Legal Malpractice: Not Just For Monetary Loss

“An attorney who commits malpractice is liable to his client for any reasonably foreseeable loss caused by his negligence including emotional distress resulting from the loss of liberty.” In Lawson v. Nugent, Plaintiff,  Gordon F. Lawson, and four co-defendants were … Continue reading

Posted in Civil Rights, Legal Malpractice | Tagged , , | Leave a comment