Title VII Extends to Third-Parties

In Thompson v. North American Stainless, the Court held that third-party retaliation claims are permitted under Title VII of the Civil Rights act. In this action, Thompson’s fiancé filed a sex discrimination charge against North American Stainless (NAS). After Thompson’s fiancé filed the charge, NAS promptly fired Thompson. Thompson then brought a claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, alleging that NAS fired him because NAS wanted to retaliate against his fiancé for filing her sex discrimination charge.
The District Court held that Thompson did not have a claim under Title VII because Title VII’s retaliation provision only protected parties that had engaged in activity that led to the discrimination. The Court reversed, however, and remanded for trial on the merits, reasoning that if Thompson’s allegations were true then NAS did in fact terminate him out of retaliation for his fiancé’s conduct. The Court held that, according to Burlington N. &S.F.R. Co. v. White, Title VII’s anti-retaliation provision must be read to cover a broad range of employer conduct.
Title VII prohibits any employer action that might dissuade a reasonable worker from making a discrimination charge and, accordingly, a reasonable worker in Thompson’s fiancé’s position would surely be dissuaded if her fiancé would be fired when she attempted to make a claim. Thus, Title VII is not limited to merely the person who was engaged in the acts that compromise of the discrimination claim, but also extends to anyone who has been injured by the unlawful employer retaliation.
Therefore, in the employment discrimination context, an employer must be mindful of why they decide to terminate an employee, because Title VII’s anti-retaliation claim is construed broadly to the benefit of the aggrieved employee.

About Matthew Weisberg

Matthew B. Weisberg, Esquire, Managing Partner of Prochniak Weisberg, P.C. (www.ppwlaw.com), focuses his practice almost exclusively on the representation of consumers who are victims of mortgage, real estate and auto purchase/financing fraud, as well as in foreclosure/debt collection defense and civil rights representation (employment discrimination and excessive police force). Five years ago having “switched sides,” Mr. Weisberg formerly represented exclusively commercial and residential lenders in the prosecution of mortgage foreclosure and distressed debt collection litigation, lender liability and real estate speculator defense, and tort defense for financial injury defendants. Matthew welcomes all attorney inquiries and especially referrals: 610-690-0801 & mweisberg@ppwlaw.com.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *